|
At the Forefront of Patient Care
More
pharmacists are collaborating with prescribers to manage drug therapy
Massive
changes in health care have been occurring at a rapid pace during the past
decade. The pharmacy profession has responded with the evolution of
pharmaceutical care, a term defined by Hepler and Strand as “the
responsible provision of drug therapy for the purpose of achieving
definite outcomes that improve the patient’s quality of life.”1
In addition to dispensing medication, pharmacists who provide
pharmaceutical care services prevent, identify and resolve potential and
actual drug-related problems; recommend effective, yet cost-saving drug
therapies; and counsel patients so that they understand the complexities
of their drug therapies. One of the tools used to provide pharmaceutical
care is collaborative drug therapy management (CDTM).
Definition of CDTM
CDTM is the terminology used to describe the partnering between physician
and pharmacist to manage drug therapy. Collaborative drug therapy
management is “practiced whenever pharmacists work with physicians and
other health professionals to solve patient and medication-related
problems or make decisions regarding drug prescribing, monitoring and drug
regimen adjustments.”2
By taking on these responsibilities, pharmacists share the responsibility
for patient outcomes with the physician.
CDTM activities may
include initiating, modifying and monitoring drug therapy; ordering and
performing lab tests; assessing response to therapy; educating and
counseling patients; and administering medications.2
Background
Recent reports in medical and pharmacy literature support increased
pharmacist involvement in the management of medication therapy, such as
occurs in CDTM. With the publication of the Institute of Medicine report
on medical errors,3 more
attention than ever has been focused on the role of the pharmacy
profession in the prevention of adverse drug events and errors. A study
published in the Journal of the American Medical Association
described the presence of a pharmacist on rounds as a member of an ICU
patient care team. This resulted in a substantially lower rate of adverse
drug events caused by prescribing errors.4
Yet another study demonstrated that pharmacists can reduce drug-related
morbidity and mortality accounting for 28.2% of hospital admissions and an
estimated cost of $76.6 billion in the ambulatory setting.5
Many pharmacy
organizations and individuals have advocated the involvement of
pharmacists in collaborative drug therapy management. The American College
of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) published a position paper advocating the role
of qualified pharmacists in managing collaborative drug therapy.6
The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) has long promoted
the role of the pharmacist in collaborative drug therapy management. This
organization and its professional staff assist states in passing
legislation to allow CDTM to occur and routinely publish advocacy
materials which are made available to ASHP’s state affiliates.
Where is it?
So where is collaborative drug therapy management taking place? CDTM
initiatives have been more commonly implemented in hospital or
health-system pharmacy practices where the oversight of the pharmacy and
therapeutics committee have made such arrangements more comfortable to the
medical community. A 2000 survey of hospital pharmacy directors across the
United States revealed that virtually all (95.4%) pharmacists monitored
medication therapy along with other duties.7
Many hospital pharmacy departments provide drug therapy management
services such as aminoglycoside dosing or total parenteral nutrition
monitoring and modification per protocol.
The
National Association of Boards of Pharmacy (NABP) recently conducted a
survey of states as a part of NABP’s Survey of Pharmacy Law. The
survey revealed that 29 states allow pharmacists to collaborate with
prescribers to initiate, modify and/or discontinue patient medication
therapy.8 Of these, 24
states have enacted statutes authorizing CDTM and four states have only
regulations in place governing CDTM. In Iowa, a published interpretation
of current laws and regulations serves as a guideline for CDTM activities.9
Considerable variations exist from state to state as to what is allowed.
Some states limit CDTM to certain practice sites, while others specify the
qualifications a pharmacist must have in order to participate in CDTM.
Still others specify the terms of an agreement between physician and
pharmacist. Some examples of successful collaborative drug therapy
management initiatives include anticoagulation, immunization
administration, emergency birth control, pain management, and
hyperlipidemia management.10
Wisconsin pharmacists
can participate in CDTM through delegation of a medical act as allowed by
sec. 448.03 (2)(e), Stats. Recently, the Wisconsin Pharmacy Examining
Board discussed pharmacist involvement in collaborative drug therapy
management and asked the Medical Examining Board and its legal counsel for
their interpretation of Section 448.03 (2)(e). In a letter dated August
29, 2000, the Wisconsin Medical Examining Board confirmed that a physician
can delegate medical acts to pharmacists pursuant to mutually approved
protocols and this section of the Wisconsin Statutes [see previous page].
This interpretation makes it feasible for pharmacists in Wisconsin to
develop collaborative drug therapy management agreements with physicians
in all facets of patient care and drug therapy management.
Getting started
A Wisconsin pharmacist interested in developing a partnership with a
physician for the purposes of collaborative drug therapy management may
initiate a discussion with a physician known to him or her. A description
of the type of drug therapy management that the pharmacist and/or pharmacy
would like to collaborate on could be presented to the physician for
discussion of feasibility, etc. A protocol could then be developed to
clearly define the roles and responsibilities of each party – the
physician’s role in diagnosis and the pharmacist’s responsibility for
monitoring or initiating therapy and modifying it as necessary. This sort
of collaborative relationship capitalizes on the expertise of the
physician in diagnosis and the pharmacist’s extensive knowledge in drug
therapy.
A written protocol
would represent a formal agreement between physician and pharmacist. It
should represent the voluntary participation of each party and be written
carefully and succinctly, defining the role of each. It could describe the
specific responsibilities authorized by the supervising physician, the
method of documentation to be used, the types of initiation and
modification of drug therapy that the pharmacist can perform and the
procedures or plans that the pharmacist should follow. Algorithms can be
included in the protocol to aid in drug therapy modification in response
to blood levels, patient response or side effects, etc. A protocol could
specify training requirements for the pharmacist involved. The protocol
should facilitate frequent, quality communication between the physician
and pharmacist and provide for oversight and quality assurance activities.
Other concerns
Unresolved issues on
the national and state level related to collaborative drug therapy
management include the necessity of mandatory additional training or
certification, as well as compensation. Another issue that should be
explored is that of liability. It would be prudent for pharmacists to find
out whether participation in a collaborative drug therapy management
agreement is covered by their respective liability policies.
Conclusion
Collaborate drug
therapy management agreements allow a physician to delegate to the
pharmacist what can be considered “medical acts,” including the
ability to initiate and modify drug therapy and order lab tests based on a
clearly defined written protocol. Awareness by the medical and pharmacy
communities of successful CDTM initiatives will help to build support for
more collaborative efforts in the future. Pharmacists are encouraged to
contact JPSW with descriptions of any CDTM initiatives they are
involved in. n
References
1.
Hepler CD, Strand LM. Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical
care. AJPE. 1989; 53:7S-15S.
2. Koch KE. Pharmaceutical care trends in collaborative drug therapy
management. Drug Benefit Trends. 2000; 12:45-54.
3. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human-building a safer
health system. Washington, DC. National Academy Press, 1999.
4. Leape LL, Cullen DJ, Clapp MD, et al. Pharmacist participation on
physician rounds and adverse drug events in the intensive care unit. JAMA.
1999; 282:267-270.
5. Johnson JA, Bootman JL. Drug-related morbidity and mortality. Arch
Intern Med. 1995; 155:1946-56.
6. Carmichael JM, O’Connell MB, Devine B et al. ACCP position
statement-collaborative drug therapy management by pharmacists. Pharmacotherapy.
1997; 17:1056-1061.
7. Pedersen CA, Schneider PJ, Santell JP, Kelly EJ. ASHP national survey
of pharmacy practice in acute care settings: monitoring, patient
education, and wellness – 2000. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2000; 57:
2171-87.
8. NABP Newsletter. Dec 2000; 29: 143.
9. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Collaborative drug
therapy management. ASHP State Advocacy Packet. Bethesda, MD: ASHP;
November 2000.
10. Barry CP, Fuller TS. A
path to pharmaceutical care (part 2): evolution of collaborative drug
therapy management. Hosp Pharm. 1998; 33:490-97.
More
resources on collaborative drug therapy management:
Fuller,
TS, Christensen, DB, and Williams, DH. Satisfaction with Prescriptive
Authority Protocols. J Am Pharm Assoc.
1996 (Dec);NS36(12);739-745.
Fuller,
TS. The pharmacist as a
prescriber: Stories from
Washington state. Pharm
Pract Manag Q. April
1995; 15:15-47.
Collaborative
Drug Therapy Management, a regular feature in Lippincott’s Hospital
Pharmacy, April 1998-present.
For
sample protocols, see the following references:
Fuller TS. Handbook of
Collaborative Drug Therapy Management. Renton WA: Washington State
Pharmacists Association; 1996. To order call 425-228-7171
The APhA Drug
Treatment Protocols. Washington DC:
American Pharmaceutical Asooication; 1999. To order call 800-878-0729 |